Biological Sciences
  
Dan Kashian
Title Assistant Professor 
Office# 3107 Biological Sciences Building
Phone (313) 577-9093
E-Mail dkash@wayne.edu

       Research Interest                       Publications                    Teaching                Lab Members               Lab News

 

When we look at a forest, grassland, or other natural area, we see and comprehend a system at one particular point in time, often with a sense of appreciation for its stability. In fact, terrestrial systems are never stable, and are always changing as the result of some past or present disturbance, be it a short, distinct event in time or a gradual, continuous process; a devastating, widespread episode or one that creates only subtle changes in a small area; an episode thought to be in sync with nature or a strictly human influence. These disturbances and the successional processes that follow them are ubiquitous, and therefore are critical drivers of terrestrial ecosystems. Indeed, the role of disturbances in molding the structure and function of ecological systems is a major paradigm in ecology. Understanding how natural disturbances such as wildfires, insect outbreaks, or windstorms – as well as human disturbances such as varying land use and the introduction of invasive species – change the structure and function of terrestrial ecosystems may underlie the future of ecology. Even as climate change may be the most widespread threat to natural ecosystems, it is the ability of climate change to alter disturbance regimes over the next century that will likely create the quickest and most extensive changes in terrestrial ecosystem composition and structure, rather than slower physiological responses of organisms to changes in temperature, precipitation, and carbon dioxide.



Dr. Kashian's Education Experience

B.S., Natural Resources, University of Michigan, 1993

M.S., Forest Ecology, University of Michigan, 1998

Ph.D., Zoology/Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin, 2002.

Postdoctoral Associate, Colorado State University, 2003-2006.

Joined WSU faculty in 2006.

 

Huge ponderosa pine

My research centers on the community, ecosystem, and landscape ecology of terrestrial ecosystems and the influence of disturbances in shaping the distribution and spatial heterogeneity of terrestrial plant communities and ecosystems. Much of my work is aimed towards understanding how the combination of site factors, biotic interactions, natural disturbances, and humans affect landscape patterns and ecosystem processes in forests. In particular, I am interested in how changing climate has (and will) affect the processes that shape disturbance dynamics and the interaction of disturbances that control plant community distribution, structure, and function, particularly in forests. My recent research has focused heavily on patterns and processes of plant and forest succession, as well as the implications of climate change for forest ecosystem structure and function at multiple spatial scales.  Nearly all of my research has been field-based, supplemented by GIS, remote sensing, and simulation modeling. My study sites include

the Front Range of Colorado, the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, northern Minnesota, northern Lower Michigan, and southeastern Michigan.

 

 

Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Much of my recent and current research has been located in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and Wyoming, particularly in and around Yellowstone National Park. The 1988 fires in Yellowstone National Park created a very complex, fine-grained mosaic of lodgepole pine seedling densities across the burned landscape.  Several investigators have speculated that this "footprint" of the 1988 fires will persist until a similar disturbance again occurs, but few studies have actually examined the length of its persistence.  I studied the portion of the Yellowstone landscape left unburned by the 1988 fires to estimate the long-term effects of wildfires on stand structural heterogeneity, how that postfire heterogeneity might change with successional time, and to determine the rates and mechanisms of these changes.  Analyses of age distributions and stand reconstructions using dendrochronology suggested the effects of large wildfires shape the structure of this landscape for almost two centuries after the disturbance.  However, stand structural variability decreases over time because initially dissimilar stand structures develop though multiple mechanisms that act to compress the initial variability towards a common stand structure.  These changes in structural variability have direct influences on changes in landscape pattern, causing the landscape to become more coarse-grained as initially dissimilar stands coalesce into larger patches.  Thus large natural disturbances such as the 1988 Yellowstone fires may leave a structural imprint on the landscape, but the initial heterogeneity will decrease as succession occurs. This work suggests that the structure and productivity of very dissimilar post-fire lodgepole pine stands converges within the fire interval on this landscape, and that very broad variability in natural lodgepole pine forest densities exists irrespective of past forest management or fire suppression – an issue under great debate regarding fire hazard and fuels management in western forests. This work also highlights the natural occurrence of uneven-aged lodgepole pine stands and lends insight into potential silvicultural alternatives in these forests.

My initial work on stand structure has been carried further to examine how global change may affect carbon cycling at stand- and landscape scales. Understanding the how climate, disturbances, and stand structure affect carbon dynamics remains an important challenge in ecology, particularly as the frequency and severity of disturbances increases with climate change.

Landscape heterogeneity in stand structure is linked to variability in carbon storage, and climate change may therefore drastically affect the carbon balance of landscapes and the globe by affecting the disturbance regimes that shape stand structure across landscapes. In Yellowstone, we asked how climate-mediated changes in fire regimes alter the distribution of carbon budgets and thus the behavior of the entire Yellowstone landscape as a net sink or source of carbon in the global carbon cycle. In particular, we focused on net ecosystem production (NEP) – the difference between net primary production and heterotrophic respiration – and how it varies with stand structure and succession. We used replicated chronosequences to measure how annual net carbon storage (NEP) varies with age and density built new allometric equations to predict tree biomass in the region, and extrapolated stocks and fluxes to the landscape.

Current work: We are currently in the midst of a study funded by the Department of Energy’s National Institute for Climate Change Research that expands the carbon/disturbance research to include insect outbreaks. The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and most of the Rocky Mountain West is experiencing an extensive and intensive insect outbreak, such that insects including the mountain pine beetle (MPB) are an important driver of carbon dynamics and may determine whether western landscapes are carbon sinks or sources. The overall objective of this study is therefore to understand how MPB outbreaks affect forest carbon storage at stand and landscape scales under multiple climate scenarios.

 

Colorado Front Range

My research focus includes applied as well as basic research that may contribute to management and conservation efforts. Much of my work is couched in conservation of biodiversity and investigates the persistence of threatened species and ecosystems across landscapes. Trembling aspen is one of the only deciduous forest types in the US Rocky Mountains, and is therefore a valued species for its contribution to biodiversity, wildlife habitat, and aesthetics.  Several investigators have documented a general decline and senecence of aspen stands across the West due to factors such as climate fluctuations, fire suppression and increased elk browse. We examined aspen stands on the northern Colorado Front Range to assess the current condition and to predict long-term trends in aspen forests across this heavily managed landscape. We identified six types of trends in aspen, distinguished mainly by the relative dominance and age distribution of aspen and co-existing conifers where applicable. Only 35% of stands exhibited age distributions that suggested a self-replacing stand, but only 24% of stands were declining. Because only 24% of aspen stands showed evidence of a true "decline", and many aspen stands in the region may have regenerated due to human activities, such a result suggests that a decrease from the current amount of aspen area may still fall within the historic range of variability of aspen coverage. This research suggests that factors leading to aspen decline such as fire exclusion, grazing, and ungulate browsing are evident within very specific ecological contexts, and their relative influences in shaping western aspen forests demand a broad-scale approach in assessing aspen decline that incorporates differences in regional and local climate.

Current work: Funded by the US Forest Service and in collaboration with John Bradford, USFS, we are initiating a new comparative study in northern Minnesota and the Colorado Front Range to examine the correlation between aspen mortality and drought. Many aspen stands throughout the southern Rocky Mountains and the Lake States not previously observed to be “declining” have experienced rather sudden, extensive canopy tree mortality over the last decade that corresponds to a relatively dry period over the last two decades. If drought causes aspen mortality, it likely reduces aspen vigor and growth, which means that drought may be adversely affecting many more aspen stands than previously realized. Understanding the relationship between drought and aspen mortality is especially important because future climatic conditions are expected to include greater frequency and severity of drought events. Our overall goal is to understand stand-level responses of aspen forests, including growth decline and mortality, to weather fluctuations, particularly drought, using a multi-scale approach that will examine differences in forest responses between regions as well as the importance of site conditions within each region.

 

Northern Lower Michigan

Kirtland's warbler is a federally endangered songbird that nests under young jack pine only in northern Lower Michigan.  The warbler nests in a given stand only for as long as there are lower live branches available to shelter the nest, such that it nests only in dense stands interpersed with small openings during a narrow window of duration of stand age.  Because jack pine regenerates over large areas only after fire, fire suppression has limited the amount of young jack pine within the warbler breeding range, and plantations are now the primary method for providing suitable habitat for the warbler.  I used a broad-scale, “top-down”, regionalization approach to classifying these ecosystems in order to understand and predict the timing and duration of use of jack pine forests by the warbler, including the importance and spatial pattern of wildfires in shaping this forest type across the breeding range, and the impact of converting natural jack pine forests to plantations. Such a description and classification of landscape ecosystems provides a useful ecological framework for conservation and management of Kirtland's warbler.

Current work: We are working on an unfunded project to examine how well Kirtland’s warbler management fits into the historical range of variability of young jack pine forests in Michigan’s northern Lower Peninsula. Never an abundant bird, the warbler’s population today numbers approximately 1800 breeding pairs as a result of highly successful, extensive jack pine plantations placed all across the breeding range specifically for this purpose. We are using historical records of forest vegetation and reconstructed fire regimes to estimate the pre-settlement coverage of young jack pine stands for comparison to current coverage to determine the appropriateness of the current levels of warbler management.

 

Southeastern Lower Michigan

Though largely urban, southeastern Michigan offers many opportunities for forest and landscape ecology research. In particular, my work is addressing the ecological impacts of the emerald ash borer (EAB) on forests in the region. In an era where rates of ecological change are unprecedented, understanding the effects of introduced species is critical for predicting their consequences for native biodiversity. Identified only in 2002, the emerald ash borer is a destructive non-native insect that kills > 85% of healthy ash trees > 2.5 cm in diameter within 3-5 years of infestation, leaving seedlings and saplings unaffected. EAB has spread from its introduction in the Detroit area to Ohio, Indiana, Ontario, Maryland, and Virginia.

Despite aggressive quarantine and eradication efforts, extensive tree mortality suggests that EAB impact on North American ash species may resemble that of chestnut blight and Dutch elm disease. Ecological research on this exotic insect has been limited to monitoring of mortality and dispersal modeling, but few data exist that describe the regenerative capacity of ash following EAB outbreaks. The overall objective of this research is to predict the future ability of ash trees to replace themselves and future changes in plant and animal composition at the forest floor where EAB-induced ash mortality is or will be extensive.

 

Publications


    Journal Articles Published

    1. Refereed Publications

Tinker, D.B., Arcano, R.M., M.G. Ryan, D.M. Kashian, and W.H. Romme. Submitted. Tree density and stand age effects on allometric equation development and biomass partitioning in lodgepole pine forests near Yellowstone National Park, WY. Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

Smithwick, E.A.H., D.M. Kashian, M.G. Ryan, and M.G. Turner. 2009. Long-term nitrogen storage and soil nitrogen availability in post-fire lodgepole pine ecosystems. Ecosystems, in press.

Smithwick, E.A.H., M.G. Ryan, D.M. Kashian, W.H. Romme, D.B. Tinker, and M.G. Turner. 2009. Modeling the effects of fire and climate change on carbon and nitrogen storage in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) stands. Global Change Biology 15: 535-548.

Kashian, D.M., W.H. Romme, and C.M. Regan. 2007. Reconciling divergent interpretations of aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range. Ecological Applications 17: 1296-1311.

Kashian, D.M., W.H. Romme, D.B. Tinker, M.G. Turner, and M.G. Ryan. 2006. Carbon storage on landscapes with stand-replacing fires. Bioscience 56: 598-606.

Schoennagel, T., M.G. Turner, D.M. Kashian, and A. Fall. 2006. Influence of fire regimes on lodgepole pine stand age and density across the Yellowstone National Park (USA) landscape. Landscape Ecology 21:1281-1296.

Binkley, D., D.M. Kashian, S. Boyden, M.W. Kaye, J. Bradford, P. Fornwalt, and M.G. Ryan. 2006. Patterns of growth dominance in forests of the Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. Forest Ecology and Management 236: 193-201.

Kashian, D.M., M.G. Turner, and W.H. Romme. 2005a. Variability in leaf area and stemwood increment along a 300-year lodgepole pine chronosequence. Ecosystems 8: 48-61

Kashian, D.M., M.G. Turner, W.H. Romme, and C.G. Lorimer. 2005b. Variability and convergence in stand structural development on a fire-dominated subalpine landscape. Ecology 86: 643-654.

Turner, M.G., D.B. Tinker, W.H. Romme, D.M. Kashian, and C.M. Litton. 2004. Landscape patterns of sapling density, leaf area, and aboveground net primary production in postfire lodgepole pine forests, Yellowstone National Park (USA). Ecosystems 7: 751-775.

Kashian, D.M., D.B. Tinker, F.L. Scarpace, and M.G. Turner. 2004. Spatial heterogeneity of lodgepole pine sapling densities following the 1988 fires in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 2263-2276.

Kashian, D.M., B.V. Barnes, and W.S. Walker. 2003. Landscape ecosystems of northern Lower Michigan and the occurrence and management of the Kirtland’s warbler. Forest Science 49: 140-159.

Walker, W.S., B.V. Barnes, and D.M. Kashian. 2003. Landscape ecosystems of the Mack Lake burn, northern Lower Michigan, and the occurrence of the Kirtland’s warbler. Forest Science 49: 119-139.

Kashian, D.M., B.V. Barnes, and W.S. Walker. 2003. Ecological species groups of landforms dominated by jack pine in northern Lower Michigan. Plant Ecology 166: 75-91.

Kashian, D.M., and B.V. Barnes. 2000. Landscape influence on the distribution and abundance of the Kirtland’s warbler in northern Lower Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1985-1904.

    2. Book Reviews

Kashian, D.M. 2005. Defending against the alien invaders.Plant Ecology 180: 275-277.

Kashian, D.M. 2005. Considering sustainable forestry on modern landscapes.Landscape Ecology 20: 1025-1027.

Kashian, D.M. 2004. Managing the matrix to conserve biodiversity (book review).Landscape Ecology 19:703-704.

    3. Technical Documents

Kaufmann, M.R., G.H. Aplet, M. Babler, W.L. Baker, B. Bentz, M. Harrington, B.C. Hawkes, L.S. Huckaby, M.J. Jenkins, D.M. Kashian, R.E. Keane, D. Kulakowski, W. McCaughy, J. Negron, J. Popp, W.H. Romme, T. Schoennagel, W. Shepperd, F.W. Smith, E.M. Sutherland, D. Tinker, and T.T. Veblen.In review.The status of our understanding of lodgepole pine and mountain pine beetles – a focus on forest ecology and potential fire behavior.Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Fort Collins, CO.

Ryan, M.G., Kashian D.M., Smithwick E.A.H., W.H. Romme, M.G. Turner, and D.B. Tinker.2008.Final Report, Carbon cycling at the landscape scale: the effect of changes in climate and fire frequency on age distribution, stand structure, and net ecosystem production. JFSP Project Number: 03-1-1-06

Nelson, K.N., D.M. Kashian, and M.G. Ryan. 2007. Planting burned areas for carbon sequestration and forest biomass removals for fossil fuels offsets.Final Report, Coalition for the Upper South Platte.

Comer, P.J., D.A. Albert, H.A. Wells, B.L. Hart, J.B. Raab, D.L. Price, D.M. Kashian, R.A. Corner, and D.W. Schuen. 1995. Michigan’s presettlement vegetation, as interpreted from the General Land Office Surveys 1816-1856.Report to the U.S. E.P.A. Water Division and the Wildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources.Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI.76 pp.

Back

 

 

Teaching


Teaching biology and ecology at the university level is important in ensuring that students are able to think critically, solve problems, communicate clearly, and - perhaps most importantly - appreciate ecological issues.College teaching demands a serious and conscientious effort, especially because it may inspire students to pursue careers in biology, ecology, and natural resources. It may be equally important in guiding non-majors or elective students to clearly communicate biological and ecological issues, because many will become influential public voices in the near future. Finally, though students are the primary benefactors of effective teaching, teaching also benefits the teacher as it fosters clear, critical thinking about their discipline.

Less formally, I simply love to teach, especially in the field. I have been lucky to have studied with several fantastic instructors throughout my career thus far, who showed me that teaching is an opportunity rather than a burden. For ecology, I believe that teaching is about being outside in the natural world, where learning is most effective and most enjoyable. I’ve found that dragging a group of students to the tree outside the window is always more effective than showing its picture. I have a career goal of teaching field-based courses whenever possible, and this is even more critical at an urban university – though it may not be intuitive. Field learning is crucial for learning ecology, as it forces students to think critically about the real, uncontrolled, often chaotic natural world, particularly those students who otherwise may never have done so.

Hiking in the bog! Examining a witch's broom IDing a Tree in Trees & Shrubs 2007

A large part of my pedagogy involves establishing myself at the students’ level rather than as an authority figure. Using an enthusiasm for the material and approachability to the students, I seek to earn rather than demand respect from my students. Teaching from the students’ perspective is absolutely critical to the teaching-learning process because effective learning is spawned by communication. A class made “fun” occurs not only when the teacher can effectively unravel complex ideas into bits of discernable understanding, but also when the teacher can cultivate the students’ thinking as part of both the teacher’s and students’ life-long learning. The teacher is not just the bearer of facts, but a veritable keystone of the teaching-learning process. I prefer to approach my teaching with the idea that although I may know more about the subject matter than my students, I can always learn from them.

I also believe that a critical part of teaching involves including undergraduate students in research, particularly field research. I actively involve students as field assistants on larger field projects in Yellowstone or southeastern Michigan, and I encourage and advise interested undergraduate students to conduct their own independent research in my lab.

Courses Taught

Biology 4130: Ecology (WI) (Winter Terms 2008 and 2009)

Biology 5180: Biology of Trees and Shrubs (Fall Terms 2007 and 2008)

Biology 8000: Foundations of Ecology (Fall 2008)

Biology 1500: Basic Life Diversity (Fall 2009)

Biology 5xxx/7xxx: Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology (Winter 2010)

Biology 5xxx/7xxx: Terrestrial Ecology (Fall 2010)

 

Back

 

Lab Members


 

 

 

Back

 

Lab News


Feb
2009
Read an article describing our lab's latest Kirtland's warbler research in the Wayne State Alumni magazine

Jan
2009
Read the article highlighting the lab’s research in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences’ newsletter, CLAS Notes.
Jan
2009
Read the feature article on our Lab’s research in the Spring 2009 edition of the Biology Department’s newsletter, BioRhythms.
Oct
2008
Dr. Dan Kashian’s interview on WDET public radio from October 14, 2008

 

Back